Horace Gregory s Short ( But Perfectly Formed D. H....

CHAPTER TWO Inquisitive D. H. Lawrence versus Anally Retentive Mr. Freud Horace Gregory’s short (but perfectly formed) D. H. Lawrence: Pilgrim of the Apocalypse (1933) explains how Lawrence’s two essays on psychoanalysis were motivated by his desire to understand. What he needed to understand was why he was as he was; how the development of masculinity and gender identity were influenced and how obstacles such as an over-possessive mother might impair these developments. Hence, his works on psychoanalysis were not written to be an acceptance of Freud’s doctrines but rather a critical approach to them. Gregory maintains the Lawrence’s essays on psychoanalysis ‘offered him the means of checking-back results of his convictions, and †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦show more content†¦What has to be realised, therefore, is that Lawrence’s introduction to psychoanalysis is different to his introduction to Freud and the two should not be confused. Arguably, though, on the question of understanding the influences on shaping oneâ₠¬â„¢s masculinity and gender identity, Lawrence’s encounters with Freud’s work were a turning point for him. Indeed, his assessments of Freud were that he was a pan-sexualist, that is, one ‘who makes sex accountable for everything,’ and his ‘reasoned’ assessment of Freud (and his work) was that he was a ‘psychiatric quack.’ Ironically, although sections in Sons and Lovers deal with situations that closely suggest what Freud called the Oedipus complex, Lawrence had written the book before he came to Freud’s work and before he mentioned Freud in his letters. Therefore, when we talk of the book’s oedipal quality and analyse Lawrence’s assessment of gender identity through Freudian psychology, this obviously presents its own problems. That is not to say such a quality does not exist in the book. It does; but Lawrence did not write with the criteria of Freud’s Oedipus complex in mind. Lawrenceâ€℠¢s theories about the role of the mother and her influence on masculine development must therefore have been coloured by other reading. Some of what Lawrence had read up to this point is documented by Jessie Chambers.

Maths Trick Chapter 1 Free Essays

Lesson1 Lesson1 These lessons are based on Vedic Maths† principles and other maths tricks. These principles are general in nature and can be applied in many ways and very very useful in commercial arthematics. I hope all of you like these lessons and make your calculation more fast and save lot of time in daily calculations and examinations or any entrance test like CAT /IIT /BANK PO /ENGINEERING ENTRANCE TEST/PMT /MCA ENTRANCE TEST/MBA ENTRANCE TEST etc etc Method for multiplying numbers where the first figures are same and the last figures add to1 0 . We will write a custom essay sample on Maths Trick Chapter 1 or any similar topic only for you Order Now 42 x 48 = Both numbers here start with 4 and the last igures (2 and 8) add up to 10. just multiply 4 by 5 (the next number up) to get 20 for the first part of the answer. And we multiply the last figures: 2 x 8 = 16 to get the last part of the answer Method for multiplying numbers where the first figures add up 10 and the last figures are same 44X64 Here first figures are 4 and 6 and their add up 10 and unit figures of both number are same Just multiplying the last figures 4Ãâ€"4=16 Put it at right hand side Again multiplying the first figures and add common degit(4Ãâ€"6 )+4=24+4=28 put it at left hand side Now we get required answer2816 Similarly 36Ãâ€"76 , 6X6 =36 right hand side , (3Ãâ€"7)+6= 21+6=27 left hand side Required answer is 2736 NOTE If multiplication of last figures is less than 10 add zero before unit digit Ex 81Ãâ€"21 , 1Ãâ€"1=01,( 8Ãâ€"2)+1= 16+1=17 Required answer 1701 Method for multiplying numbers where the first number†s add up10 and and the second number’s digits are same 46X55 Here first number’s add up is 10 and second number â€Å"s digits are common i. e 5 Just multiplying last figures of both numbers 6Ãâ€"5 =30 put it at right hand side Again multiplying first figures of both numbers and add common digit of second number (4Ãâ€"5)+5 =20+5 =25 put it left hand side Required answer is 2530 ( If multiplication is in unit in first step add zero before it) file:///D|/Documents%20and%20Settings/sanjay/Desktop/maths%20tricks/lesson1ur20. htm (1 of 3)6/25/2003 4:00:19 PM Lesson1 Multiplying numbers just over 100. 108 x 109 = 11772 The answer is in two parts: 117 and 72, 117 is just 108 + 9 (or 109 + 8), and 72 is just 8 x 9. Similarly 107 x 106 = 11342 HOW USEFUL IS THIS CALCULATION! EXAMPLE 1 Compute the amount and the compound intrest on Rs 10000. 00 on 2. years at4%per annum. Now 4Ãâ€"4=16 and 4+4=8 put 10 it becomes Rs 10816. 00 How simple ! o calculation no extra time ! Practice Test 1 Solve mentally these questions Note down your calculation time by watch (Suggested time 90 seconds) 22 X 28 35 X 35 48 X 42 73 X 33 12 X 92 48 X 28 28 X 22 37 X 88 91 X 66 118 X105 109 X108 112 X106 91 X 99 33 X 37 55X55 Now check your answer with the help of a calculator Back Home Next file:///D|/Documents%20and%20Settings/sanjay/Desktop/maths%20tricks/lesson1ur2 0. htm (2 of 3)6/25/2003 4:00:19 PM Lesson1 file:///D|/Documents%20and%20Settings/sanjay/Desktop/maths%20tricks/lesson1ur20. htm (3 of 3)6/25/2003 4:00:19 PM How to cite Maths Trick Chapter 1, Essay examples

Case Study of Daniels v Anderson (1994) Free-Samples for Students

Question: Using only the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the Common Law Cases, advise Heston using the ILAC Method as of todays date. Answer: Issue Under the Corporation Act 2001 (CTH): As per the case study the issue that arises that, the decision of Gordon can modify the original idea of Jamie who can accept to rescue the company from economic collapse. The case was involves criticized the business operation in consideration with the regulations of corporations Act 2001. Law As per the case study, this case, it can be said that the regulations of Corporation Act 2001 requires a company and management to disclose the organizational document with respect to the business details. The regulations of Corporation Act 2001 section 180- 197 established the facts that the directors of the company to act as per due diligence, good faith and integrity by using the position and relevant information within the company. In addition, section 191- 196 of Corporation Act requires the directors of the company to provide all the relevant disclosure based on the business activities to avoid the potential conflict of interest and to prevent insolvent trading. In section 180 (2) of the Corporations Act 2001 established that while taking a business decision or judgment it is essential to take decisions by allow the proper business purpose and in good faith. It is also establish that the directors of the company must not have any material interest at the time of taking any business project or subject matter for business operations. The regulation of this act also provides that the directors can be applied to take business decisions based on the best interest of company where they together work with the benefits of the companys stakeholders. Application As per the case study, the regulations of Corporation Act for duties of directors and managers to be performed while considering business decisions, it can be said the present case involves many issues for performing the business activities for providing meals to the school. As per the rulings held in case of Healey v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2011) FCA 717, court contended that the directors of the company failed to provide appropriate disclosure for liabilities and debts. It was held that the director of the company failed to provide information on short- term guarantees and other short- term liabilities, reflecting the breach of section 180(1) affecting the companys true and fair view. Accordingly, it can be said that in the present situation, Gordon noticed the huge loss within the business but failed to disclose the information about the lack of money to pay debts. Again in the case of Daniels v Anderson (1994) SC of IL, the court contended the equitable conversion, the party breached the regulations for not providing the duty with due care as well as appropriate skill. Similarly, in the present case it has been noted that the concerned person of the company failed to disclose the failure of business project at the time of giving the idea of up gradation in the original business plan was also not disclosed. Conclusion According the case study, the directors of the company failed to disclose proper information, which give results of in huge loss in the business income, Gordon, can be said to have breached the regulations of section 180. Accordingly, Gordon had recommended reviewing the actions of the directors and filing a legal application for breach of regulation